Burung Indonesia Eka Tresnawan - The carbon debt created when woody biomass is burned takes centuries to pay off.
Two new independent scientific studies commissioned by BirdLife International, the European Environmental Bureau and Transport & Environment cast further doubt on the EU’s policy of promoting biomass as fuel for heat and power generation, and biofuels for transport.
Massage is a traditional technique involving gentle applying of overnight delivery cialis oil to the skin and then giving smooth strokes, taps and kneads to the areas requiring treatment. What’s more, if the configuration is not appealing at all it passes on the message promptly that the item may be second rate and may be of no utilization. buy sildenafil cheap https://drscoinc.com/city/cumberland/ Dysfunctionality of the endocrine backend responsive system Presence of a medical doctor required before LLLT canadian levitra can be used. There are cialis generico mastercard many anti Ed drugs that help improve blood circulation, you can also opt for the techniques that do not require your partners help and you can manage them all by yourself. The first study, carried out by Joanneum Research, identifies a major flaw in the way carbon savings from forest-derived biomass are calculated in EU law as well as under UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol mechanisms. It concludes that harvesting trees for energy creates a ‘carbon debt’: the carbon contained in the trees is emitted upfront while trees grow back over many years. The true climate impact of so-called woody biomass in the short to medium term can, as a result, be worse than the fossil fuels it is designed to replace.
“The EU is taking out a sub-prime carbon mortgage that it may never be able to pay back. Biomass policy needs to be fixed before this regulatory failure leads to an ecological crisis that no bail out will ever fix”, commented Ariel Brunner, Head of EU Policy at BirdLife International.